CVE-2025-71065

EPSS 0.0%
  • Published: 2026-01-13T16:16:05.853

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock

As Jiaming Zhang and syzbot reported, there is potential deadlock in
f2fs as below:

Chain exists of:
&sbi->cp_rwsem –> fs_reclaim –> sb_internal#2

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
—- —-
rlock(sb_internal#2);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(sb_internal#2);
rlock(&sbi->cp_rwsem);

*** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kswapd0/73:
#0: ffffffff8e247a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:7015 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8e247a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x951/0x2800 mm/vmscan.c:7389
#1: ffff8880118400e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
#1: ffff8880118400e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: super_cache_scan+0x91/0x4b0 fs/super.c:197
#2: ffff888011840610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x8d9/0x1b60 fs/f2fs/inode.c:890

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 73 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:

dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
check_noncircular+0x134/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1537
f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2278 [inline]
f2fs_lock_op fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2357 [inline]
f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x21c/0x10c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:791
f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10a/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:867
f2fs_truncate+0x489/0x7c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:925
f2fs_evict_inode+0x9f2/0x1b60 fs/f2fs/inode.c:897
evict+0x504/0x9c0 fs/inode.c:810
f2fs_evict_inode+0x1dc/0x1b60 fs/f2fs/inode.c:853
evict+0x504/0x9c0 fs/inode.c:810
dispose_list fs/inode.c:852 [inline]
prune_icache_sb+0x21b/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1000
super_cache_scan+0x39b/0x4b0 fs/super.c:224
do_shrink_slab+0x6ef/0x1110 mm/shrinker.c:437
shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:550 [inline]
shrink_slab+0x7ef/0x10d0 mm/shrinker.c:628
shrink_one+0x28a/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4955
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5016 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5094 [inline]
shrink_node+0x315d/0x3780 mm/vmscan.c:6081
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6941 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:7124 [inline]
kswapd+0x147c/0x2800 mm/vmscan.c:7389
kthread+0x70e/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:463
ret_from_fork+0x4bc/0x870 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245

The root cause is deadlock among four locks as below:

kswapd
– fs_reclaim — Lock A
– shrink_one
– evict
– f2fs_evict_inode
– sb_start_intwrite — Lock B

– iput
– evict
– f2fs_evict_inode
– sb_start_intwrite — Lock B
– f2fs_truncate
– f2fs_truncate_blocks
– f2fs_do_truncate_blocks
– f2fs_lock_op — Lock C

ioctl
– f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write
– f2fs_lock_op — Lock C
– __f2fs_commit_atomic_write
– __replace_atomic_write_block
– f2fs_get_dnode_of_data
– __get_node_folio
– f2fs_check_nid_range
– f2fs_handle_error
– f2fs_record_errors
– f2fs_down_write — Lock D

open
– do_open
– do_truncate
– security_inode_need_killpriv
– f2fs_getxattr
– lookup_all_xattrs
– f2fs_handle_error
– f2fs_record_errors
– f2fs_down_write — Lock D
– f2fs_commit_super
– read_mapping_folio
– filemap_alloc_folio_noprof
– prepare_alloc_pages
– fs_reclaim_acquire — Lock A

In order to a
—truncated—

Related CVE by CWE

No related CWE found.

Top CVE for Vendor

No vendor taxonomy on this entry.

Recently Exploited Similar Vulnerabilities

No recent KEV-listed items for this vendor/product.

How to fix CVE-2025-71065

CVE-2025-71065 is a unknown severity vulnerability affecting the affected product.

Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock As Jiaming Zhang and syzbot reported, there is potential deadlock in f2fs as below: Chain exists of: &sbi->cp_rwsem –> fs_reclaim –> sb_internal#2 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 —- —- rlock(sb_internal#2); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(sb_internal#2); rlock(&sbi->cp_rwsem); * DEADLOCK * 3 locks […]

Exploit Difficulty: HARD
⏱️ Time to exploit: > 4 hours
🛠️ Required skills: Advanced security expertise
💰 Public exploits: Rare or not public

How to Fix:

1 Identify affected systems

- Check if you're running the affected product

2 Immediate actions

- Update to the latest patched version
- If patching is not immediately possible: restrict network exposure, apply least-privilege access

3 Verification

- Test the fix in a staging environment first
- Review logs for signs of exploitation
- Monitor for IOCs (Indicators of Compromise)

4 Long-term prevention

- Enable automatic security updates
- Set up vulnerability monitoring
- Review and harden security configurations

Exploit Difficulty Assessment

HARD
⏱️ Time to Exploit: > 4 hours
🛠️ Skills Required: Advanced security expertise
💰 Public Exploits: Rare or not public

Vulnerability Timeline

Jan 13, 2026
Vulnerability Published

CVE details first published to NVD database

Jan 13, 2026
Imported to Database

Added to this CVE tracking system

Detection Rules & IOCs

No specific detection rules generated for this vulnerability type.

No vendor/product data available.