CVE-2025-40122
- Published: 2025-11-12T11:15:41.677
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/x86/intel: Fix IA32_PMC_x_CFG_B MSRs access error
When running perf_fuzzer on PTL, sometimes the below “unchecked MSR
access error” is seen when accessing IA32_PMC_x_CFG_B MSRs.
[ 55.611268] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x1986 (tried to write 0x0000000200000001) at rIP: 0xffffffffac564b28 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30)
[ 55.611280] Call Trace:
[ 55.611282]
[ 55.611284] ? intel_pmu_config_acr+0x87/0x160
[ 55.611289] intel_pmu_enable_acr+0x6d/0x80
[ 55.611291] intel_pmu_enable_event+0xce/0x460
[ 55.611293] x86_pmu_start+0x78/0xb0
[ 55.611297] x86_pmu_enable+0x218/0x3a0
[ 55.611300] ? x86_pmu_enable+0x121/0x3a0
[ 55.611302] perf_pmu_enable+0x40/0x50
[ 55.611307] ctx_resched+0x19d/0x220
[ 55.611309] __perf_install_in_context+0x284/0x2f0
[ 55.611311] ? __pfx_remote_function+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611314] remote_function+0x52/0x70
[ 55.611317] ? __pfx_remote_function+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611319] generic_exec_single+0x84/0x150
[ 55.611323] smp_call_function_single+0xc5/0x1a0
[ 55.611326] ? __pfx_remote_function+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611329] perf_install_in_context+0xd1/0x1e0
[ 55.611331] ? __pfx___perf_install_in_context+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611333] __do_sys_perf_event_open+0xa76/0x1040
[ 55.611336] __x64_sys_perf_event_open+0x26/0x30
[ 55.611337] x64_sys_call+0x1d8e/0x20c0
[ 55.611339] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x120
[ 55.611343] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
On PTL, GP counter 0 and 1 doesn’t support auto counter reload feature,
thus it would trigger a #GP when trying to write 1 on bit 0 of CFG_B MSR
which requires to enable auto counter reload on GP counter 0.
The root cause of causing this issue is the check for auto counter
reload (ACR) counter mask from user space is incorrect in
intel_pmu_acr_late_setup() helper. It leads to an invalid ACR counter
mask from user space could be set into hw.config1 and then written into
CFG_B MSRs and trigger the MSR access warning.
e.g., User may create a perf event with ACR counter mask (config2=0xcb),
and there is only 1 event created, so “cpuc->n_events” is 1.
The correct check condition should be “i + idx >= cpuc->n_events”
instead of “i + idx > cpuc->n_events” (it looks a typo). Otherwise,
the counter mask would traverse twice and an invalid “cpuc->assign[1]”
bit (bit 0) is set into hw.config1 and cause MSR accessing error.
Besides, also check if the ACR counter mask corresponding events are
ACR events. If not, filter out these counter mask. If a event is not a
ACR event, it could be scheduled to an HW counter which doesn’t support
ACR. It’s invalid to add their counter index in ACR counter mask.
Furthermore, remove the WARN_ON_ONCE() since it’s easily triggered as
user could set any invalid ACR counter mask and the warning message
could mislead users.
Related CVE by CWE
No related CWE found.
Top CVE for Vendor
No vendor taxonomy on this entry.
Recently Exploited Similar Vulnerabilities
No recent KEV-listed items for this vendor/product.
How to fix CVE-2025-40122
Description: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/x86/intel: Fix IA32_PMC_x_CFG_B MSRs access error When running perf_fuzzer on PTL, sometimes the below “unchecked MSR access error” is seen when accessing IA32_PMC_x_CFG_B MSRs. [ 55.611268] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x1986 (tried to write 0x0000000200000001) at rIP: 0xffffffffac564b28 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30) [ 55.611280] Call Trace: […]
Exploit Difficulty: HARD
⏱️ Time to exploit: > 4 hours
🛠️ Required skills: Advanced security expertise
💰 Public exploits: Rare or not public
How to Fix:
- Check if you're running the affected product
- Update to the latest patched version
- If patching is not immediately possible: restrict network exposure, apply least-privilege access
- Test the fix in a staging environment first
- Review logs for signs of exploitation
- Monitor for IOCs (Indicators of Compromise)
- Enable automatic security updates
- Set up vulnerability monitoring
- Review and harden security configurations
Exploit Difficulty Assessment
Vulnerability Timeline
CVE details first published to NVD database
Added to this CVE tracking system
Detection Rules & IOCs
No specific detection rules generated for this vulnerability type.
No vendor/product data available.